The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the internet is amazing PubMed is amazing scub is amazing we're live in an age where you can read articles anyone listening to this can read all of the articles in the world there is no siloing of information like there used to be 50 years ago you can go on your computer and have access to all of medical information essentially in the world and you can become an expert you can think for yourself
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.