The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
remember the piece of the foods that your ancestors have been eating and thriving on for so long we're not used to eating them when we say gross it's just me there's a lot of condition in there that limits what we can do with these organs but you can see right here I've got some heart this is actually from a deer that I respectfully harvested with my beau earlier this year and then you've got some bones right here so bone marrow is super interesting
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and if price looked at these cultures every culture around the world you know if you look at your heritage you'll find meals that are based in these kind of organs you know um your bones and bone marrow where where the body stores these um these nutrients