The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
there's um it's actually sorelens are in things like celery so this is a dermatologic journal from 1992 severe phototoxic burn from celery ingestion so rulings are pretty pretty widely studied and basically this is a response saying that because this person was eating a pound of celery root it contained 22.5 milligrams of sorrellin
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
celery has nitrates and sorolin sorulins appear to be able to become incorporated into the dna at the level of our skin perhaps leading to photosensitivity
Sorellans from these roots and stems of plants do accumulate in the skin the crossing DNA and they appear to make us more sensitive to ultraviolet light
Sorellens p-s-o-r-a-l-e-n-s where are sorellans found they're found in parsnips they're found in celery they're found in carrots they're found in this APA Ace family of foods... sorellans if you were doing a celery juice cleanse or something or eating tons of carrot juice will accumulate in yours in your skin in your dermis they can cross-link with DNA and then cause problems when exposed to the sun