The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
look we know soda is bad we know donuts are bad like that's not it but people still drink sour and people still eat donuts okay so like well that's not gonna change well I think is important is there is a lot of people that want to get healthy and they're following non-ideal strategies you know like a healthy grain based diet or whatever whatever I think the biggest victories we just changed perception like look meat is healthy animal products are health food
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.