Peter Attia· MD
i think it really comes down to dose yes i think it is i think those studies were really based on rats or rodents consuming doses that simply couldn't be replicated by humans
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think it really comes down to dose yes i think it is i think those studies were really based on rats or rodents consuming doses that simply couldn't be replicated by humans
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the doses of the sugar substitutes are are are literally orders of magnitudes greater than than what would be consumed by humans
the study the rat study that got everybody worried about um um sacran was you know rats that were being rats that develop tumors were being fed the equivalent of 800 diet sodas for every day of their life life
the the the study the rat study that got everybody worried about about um uh sacran was you know rats that were being rats that develop tumors were being fed the equivalent of 800 diet sodas for every day of their life