We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the um the heme iron studies are often done in calcium deficient rat models which are probably not super relevant and as we've sort of hinted at before the the lack of a of a meat matrix for many of these studies is something to be aware of and the potential that yeah the potential that this is uh this is a real flaw in these methodologies
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.