Paul Saladino· MD
now if you're very very active then you have to increase the carbs because otherwise just like we discussed we're basically like you're starting your body of the glucose and it will find some way to get it right
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
now if you're very very active then you have to increase the carbs because otherwise just like we discussed we're basically like you're starting your body of the glucose and it will find some way to get it right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you're inducing a low carb State because your activity level is going up then you have to sort of match your intake now otherwise you're going to start seeing your health decline
so it's almost like be sedentary and eat less carbs or be active and eat more carbs and I prefer the latter more active in integrating more carbohydrates
the whole low carb if you're if you're inducing a low carb State because your activity level is going up then you have to sort of match your intake now otherwise you're going to start seeing your health decline