Paul Saladino· MD
the Narrative that the fruit we're eating has been hybridized and made over sweet doesn't really hold up to examination at least in a tropical region which is where humans likely began and spent the majority of our time
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the Narrative that the fruit we're eating has been hybridized and made over sweet doesn't really hold up to examination at least in a tropical region which is where humans likely began and spent the majority of our time
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
for the majority of evolution you can make an argument that humans would have had access to different types of fruit throughout the year that were that were actually pretty darn sweet