The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if indeed isocaloric manipulations of macronutrients change energy expenditure it's not an enormous difference what does that mean in English if you give two people equally caloric diets that are radically different in macronutrients do you have a significant difference in energy expenditure that's what was being tested by that theory and I think that the evidence is much more clearly in favor of the fact that no you do not
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if indeed isocaloric manipulations of macronutrients change energy expenditure it's not an enormous difference