Paul Saladino· MD
and if they don't feel the animal's fat they will just leave it they'll be rejected as food even if they've hunted it
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
and if they don't feel the animal's fat they will just leave it they'll be rejected as food even if they've hunted it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if there are only mean animals around they would say there's no food there's no food if there's only lean animals
there's there's a really interesting thing that kind of happens with indigenous diets if we look at them and it is that generally they're either high in protein excuse me they're either high in carbohydrates or fat I'm not usually high in both
there are many anthropologic ethnographic indigenous reports of people who hunt animals and they say there's no food here because the animals are too lean indigenous people know this you need fat on the animal or carbohydrates