We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
when we look at sperm quality of males in Loma Linda its abysmal it's very light they're hyper they're hype they have hyper motility so slow motility and the sperm council lower and the sperm counts vegetarians are worse than omnivores and the sperm counts of vegans in Loma Linda are worse than vegetarians
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they looked at food intake and sperm characteristics in a quote blue zone this is loma linda the quote blue zone in southern california where there's loma linda university and a seventh-day adventist community and to the point of what you and i have been talking about for this entire podcast they looked at the sperm motility they looked at sperm counts in non-vegetarians lacto-ovo vegetarians and they found that i'll read the conclusion here the study showed that the vegetables based food intake decreased sperm quality in particular a reduction in sperm quality in male factor