We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
which is from what i will tell what from what i've observed at a broad level that all plants are good the more plants you eat the better and that if you're not thriving it's because you're not eating enough so the book was meant to be a counterpoint to that and an examination of a different way of considering sort of the nutritional landscape
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i think that the majority of people out there when they have any sort of health issue if they get any sort of nutritional advice it will be eat more plants and i don't think that that's the answer for a lot of people