We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
if you notice on this chicken it'll say like up to a 5% retained water there it's very hard to see but that means this chicken was water chilled so they slaughter them dunk them in like a water bath with a little bit of chlorine and it soaks up a lot of that which affects the texture and stuff so you want air chilled chicken but they actually don't have it here so even this organic chicken yeah it's not ideal but it's the best you can do here
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when the chicken says retained water in it, it means that it's been chilled in a bath that has chlorine and other potential chemicals.