Paul Saladino· MD
what's fascinating in this paper is that you can look at the final incidence of mammary tumors percent of rats with tumors and total yield of rats fed diets containing different levels of efa the percent efa
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what's fascinating in this paper is that you can look at the final incidence of mammary tumors percent of rats with tumors and total yield of rats fed diets containing different levels of efa the percent efa
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.