The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we're not restricting foods we're taking away the foods that are making you sick i mean if you knew that these foods were making someone sick and you took them away that's the answer that's not the problem and i think that you have to be selective in intentional foods but this idea that like all foods fit it's [ __ ] for me it's horrible it's massive it's monkey [ __ ] like it's i don't even know what the hierarchy is
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.