We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
most of the studies are done and with like red blood cells in like culture or in test tubes looking at agglutination assays with food lectins and it doesn't really seem to have any physiologic basis or correlate in the human body
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's no evidence there's not a shred of evidence that you can use blood group antigens one of 33 different types of blood typing to determine who gets what