The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
but a lot of how we feel while we eat and after we eat is because of this vagus sensing of what's in our gut. It's sending information all the time. Is there sugar? Are there fats? Are there contaminants? There are a lot of information.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
A lot of how we feel while we eat and after we eat is because of this vagus sensing of what's in our gut. It's sending information all the time. Is there sugar? Are there fats? Are there contaminants?
the Vegas is very tied to appetite so if you think about this if we were to turn up that sympathetic dial our hunger gets turn down we don't really want to be hungry while we're in the middle of some stressor right but after that period of stressor is over theoretically we've burned energy we need to restore and eat and so the Vegas is very connected to the gut and to hunger centers and it feeds up into medulla and it's control hypothalamus there's a very strong vagal relationship to hunger and the desire to eat