Paul Saladino· MD
I think that the argument comes down to why would you eat a plan we know they're full of anti nutrients so there better be something unique about the plants and I've never seen a convincing argument for it
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I think that the argument comes down to why would you eat a plan we know they're full of anti nutrients so there better be something unique about the plants and I've never seen a convincing argument for it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i don't see a benefit to excluding them from the diet it seems like a much safer proposition that is evolutionarily consistent to me