The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
what we ended up realizing is what we were doing was filling gaps in bad diets we were just filling gaps we weren't putting anything in addition to what would be in a good diet and so that's really what the bar is all about is filling gaps and underneath that is this idea that if you do that you're going to improve metabolism even if you do that on top of a diet that isn't well balanced it has too many carbs or too much fat
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the the beauty of this bar is that there are multiple ingredients working together that's what we suspected but we didn't know
these are simply Norm noral dietary amounts of critical ingredients that are missing from poor diets and all we've done is put them back in and we get this dramatic change in metabolism
what we ended up realizing is what we were doing was filling gaps in bad diets we were just filling gaps we weren't putting anything in addition to what would be in a good diet and so that's really what the bar is all about is filling gaps