The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think there's an evolutionary precedent here that we are absolutely just overloading the omega-6 side of the pathway it uses the same enzymes and so you see a benefit to omega-3 but i think that's just because it's giving people epa and dha that they can't actually make otherwise
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i don't think omega-3 in itself is a panacea i think you need to get rid of the omega-6s and then your body will make all the omega-3s it needs and just a small amount of omega-3 i think is ideal for humans