The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Um, number three is that it has to taste good because if you don't like how it tastes, you're probably not going to eat it. And if you don't eat it, it's not going to help you, right? You're just carrying it. And then four, I kind of look at like nutritional composition. I'll go, okay, am I getting enough protein?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
One, it's got to be good on my stomach. That's rule number one because if you eat something that's going to upset your stomach and you got to hike 25 miles, you're going to have a really, really bad day, right? So figuring that out. um that tends to be foods that aren't super super fibery and um are are a little more processed rather than less. So your stomach's not doing the processing. um two, it obviously has to be calorie dense because if you take let's say to give a kind of extreme example, 2 lbs in peanut butter, that has way more calories than two pounds in apples and it also takes up uh less room in your pack, right? So stuff tends to be calorie dense. like nuts, bars, things like that. Um, at night I'll have like tortillas and salami and some dried fruit, things like that. Um, number three is that it has to taste good because if you don't like how it tastes, you're probably not going to eat it. And if you don't eat it, it's not going to help you, right? You're just carrying it.