The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, we're just finishing up a study where same thing instead of two fibers we added two more betaglucan and resistant starch and we're trying to see their effects as supplements. Uh, and the idea ultimately is is I think people do supplements. That's why we're doing supplements. Not that I'm a big fan. I'd rather they eat, you know, healthier unprocessed food or both.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.