The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I don't think there are any risks to eating animal foods exclusively there are no risks in terms of kidney function and there are many studies which show that high protein diets do not affect kidney function there are no studies interventional II the show that eating meat is going to increase the risk of any single cancer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I don't think there are any risks to eating animal Foods exclusively there are no risks in terms of kidney function there are many studies which show that high protein diets do not affect kidney function there are no studies interventionally that show that eating meat is going to increase the risk of any single cancer