Andrew Huberman· PhD
If you want to eat the good food or the healthy food, you know, place place the nuts on the counter rather than the chips or something like that, right?
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
If you want to eat the good food or the healthy food, you know, place place the nuts on the counter rather than the chips or something like that, right?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the healthy food is on the counter and the TV is behind a wall unit and a cabinet where you're less likely to see it and the remote controller is inside a drawer
that's making it more likely that you will just choose the good thing because the healthy food is on the counter and the TV is behind a wall unit in a cabinet where you're less likely to see it and the remote controller is inside a drawer
uh that's making it more likely that you will just choose the good thing because the healthy food is on the counter and the TV is behind a wall unit and a cabinet where you're less likely to see it and the remote control is inside a drawer and there's a book in its place and you have a couple books that are scattered around in your desk waiting for you to pick them up and open them.
If there aren't Twinkies in your house at 2 a.m., you can't eat them at 2 a.m.