Paul Saladino· MD
So, when the milk was heated above 65°, they lost the allergy protection and the native whey proteins and as well as extensive protein aggregation was observed at 75° C.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, when the milk was heated above 65°, they lost the allergy protection and the native whey proteins and as well as extensive protein aggregation was observed at 75° C.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, when the milk was heated above 65°, they lost the allergic protection and the native whey proteins and as well as extensive protein aggregation was observed at 75° C.