The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I think about these cells lining our small intestine that literally have nutrient sensors like and literal receptors on the cell membrane in the luminal side of the gut that's facing all the food that are just sitting there like waiting to bind with these things in our food that will stimulate the cell to make the satiety hormone that poof effortly makes us not hungry gets rid of that grip of attachment to Cravings
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there are two parallel tracks one within our system Pathways to satiation that totally right multiple Pathways to satiation one depending on taste one dependent on actual nutrient content
there's a lot of stuff going on that contributes to ultimately that sensation of uh satiety satiation would be the the proper term for it and uh and satisfaction that causes us to end the meal
certainly stomach distension is is a biggie
certainly stomach distension is is a biggie yeah