The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but there are definitely people in the carnivore community and the ketogenic community who love to cite studies that are done in mice done with hypercaloric ingestion of fructose or done with other poor study designs of fructose that cause major problems and use these to advance the hypothesis or advance the idea that fructose is harmful for humans
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.