The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at plant food I believe it's ultimately a negative and this is what you see with vegans in people who only eat plant foods there's often an improvement in health at the onset within the first few months because they're eliminating something that might be triggering them whether it's processed foods or sugars or dairy but at long-term within two to three years the the trajectory for vegans almost without fail is nutritional catastrophe
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
people may feel quote good on a plant-based diet for a few years and so you see what you see is people proclaiming I feel great on a plant-based diet and you're getting this window this snapshot of people in the first two to three years over and over and over and then people fall off