The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's this whole hygiene hypothesis argument on the back side saying maybe we're too clean you know like maybe we should let our kids play in the dirt maybe we should let our kids you know fall down and skin their knee maybe we should let our kids eat some raw meat or eat some undercooked meat or you know get sick every once in a while maybe we're all meant to get food poisoning
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i think that there's this whole hygiene hypothesis argument on the backside saying maybe we're too clean you know like maybe we should let our kids play in the dirt maybe we should let our kids you know fall down and skin their knee maybe we should let our kids eat some raw meat or eat some undercooked meat or you know get sick every once in a while maybe we're all meant to get food poisoning