The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
meaning that for some people plants are going to cause real problems i just posted on instagram today somebody said that they're um somebody said that their uh their son was doing much better in terms of asthma when they got rid of all the plants
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
for everyone an elimination of all the plants would really give you an idea of how good you could feel and then you could see if you wanted to incorporate that back in
eliminating some or all plants can lead to health for humans and that's my perspective