We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
so let's look at the 2009 paper cited in the fact check article and another 2009 paper from Darius mazafarian stating that seed oils are beneficial for humans let's start with this one the effects on coronary heart disease of increasing polyunsaturated fat in place of saturated fat a systematic review of and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials so this looks like a good title Until you realize that what he's done is conflate omega-3 with omega-6
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.