The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what is increasingly clear is that fructose from fruit is not that bad for humans at all in fact might be part of a very healthy diet like an animal-based diet as i would argue and there are good studies to show this i'm going to show you a study that rick johnson has done specifically in his clinic looking at a low fructose diet where they added back fruit and didn't see any problems
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.