The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there is if three or four percent is too much really and we have everyone at between six and 14 percent now you're not even gonna see a signal in epidemiology between linoleic acid and and cancer because everyone's above the threshold
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if all of the humans studied are along the flat portion a high versus a low linoleic acid consumption might not look any different because there is a leveling off in terms of at least this cancer outcome