Paul Saladino· MD
the paper that i showed might suggest that you know maybe maybe the ones that are beneficial for humans i mean a significant amount of them might actually show up in in animal foods
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the paper that i showed might suggest that you know maybe maybe the ones that are beneficial for humans i mean a significant amount of them might actually show up in in animal foods
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the phytochemicals we do get them through animal source foods but they are about five to twenty fold lower than if we get them directly from plant roots and we don't know about the bioavailability yet
it represents an avenue by which additional unique phytochemicals are ingested because animals consume plants that you and i cannot consume so it's a way of increasing the the diversity of these of these compounds