Peter Attia· MD
what we're seeing here is normally in the 0.7, 0.8 grams per minute under normal.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what we're seeing here is normally in the 0.7, 0.8 grams per minute under normal.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
put it this way we have had blocks where we just have been looking at how high we can get the in fat dogs and this it is extremely high you get to you get you're probably getting close to one gram per minute then no even higher