Paul Saladino· MD
the point being is we cannot determine from a data if one can be the other and that's also beside the point the point is is that what we found was is that these are not nutritionally interchangeable
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the point being is we cannot determine from a data if one can be the other and that's also beside the point the point is is that what we found was is that these are not nutritionally interchangeable
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.