The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I will show you a 2009 meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials looking at polyunsaturated fatty acids done by Darius mazafarian which excludes the randomized controlled trials done in the 60s and 70s specifically Minnesota coronary and Sydney diet heart which found that seed oils were harmful for humans
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.