Paul Saladino· MD
the idea around a carnivorous diet is that removing plants is a benefit because of all of the negative things in plants all the toxins all the uh digestive enzyme Inhibitors etc etc
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the idea around a carnivorous diet is that removing plants is a benefit because of all of the negative things in plants all the toxins all the uh digestive enzyme Inhibitors etc etc
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you're getting all these digestive enzyme inhibitors with P protein or whatever
the downside to plants is something I've talked about a lot but we haven't talked about it a lot here it's you know they have anti nutrients they they're not they're not always benign they're not just totally friendly species and throughout our history at least recent history anthropology and ethnography we can see that these recent hunter-gatherers went to great lengths to detoxify a lot of those plants in the situations
plant foods are not uniquely benign for humans and that they do contain anti-nutrients and digestive enzyme inhibitors in many cases and that the inclusion of these can affect things negatively