The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
even sweet potatoes have defense chemicals that can bother some people remember the framework for which i uh that i use to think about this dietary approach or all the approach dietary approaches is if you are thriving do not change a thing about your diet but if you are not thriving it is a good thing to question your assumptions and to consider the fact that many of these plant chemicals may be harming humans
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
even sweet potatoes have defense chemicals that can bother some people remember the framework for which i uh that i use to think about this dietary approach or all dairy dietary approaches is if you are thriving do not change a thing about your diet but if you are not thriving it is a good thing to question your assumptions and to consider the fact that many of these plant chemicals may be harming humans