Andrew Huberman· PhD
Can it be helpful under certain circumstances? Like I think the answer to that is, yeah. I mean, I know the answer to that is yes. 'Cause I've seen it play out clinically that way, but think it can also be harmful too.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Can it be helpful under certain circumstances? Like I think the answer to that is, yeah. I mean, I know the answer to that is yes. 'Cause I've seen it play out clinically that way, but think it can also be harmful too.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.