Paul Saladino· MD
and evolutionarily inconsistent because clearly our ancestors were eating fruit i mean in in tanzania when we got honey we ate the crap out of it it was delicious and they were not worried about it
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
and evolutionarily inconsistent because clearly our ancestors were eating fruit i mean in in tanzania when we got honey we ate the crap out of it it was delicious and they were not worried about it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
fructose is vestigal
it's like you said this is an energy source it's in a food that our ancestors undoubtedly consumed it's in a food that all hunter gatherer tribes ever studied on the planet consume
vidual essentially means it's an evolutionary hold hold over that has no value anymore for an organism so he's just saying fructose is in our diets now as an evolutionary — sort of fossil our primate ancestors