Andrew Huberman· PhD
and to me it just makes so much more sense like give teeth the mineral that they normally use to re mineralize um it just makes sense like biometic
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and to me it just makes so much more sense like give teeth the mineral that they normally use to re mineralize um it just makes sense like biometic
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
to me it just makes so much more sense like give teeth the mineral that they normally use to re mineralize — it just makes sense like biometic