Peter Attia· MD
Nutritional epidemiology is basically the board game equivalent of a Ouija board—whatever you want it to say, it will say.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Nutritional epidemiology is basically the board game equivalent of a Ouija board—whatever you want it to say, it will say.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's you can't you do epidemiology and half the time they get the wrong answer they said they establish some Association