The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
vegetables are the part of the plant that it wants you to eat not at all it's the most toxic part of the plant this is not debatable it's full of Defense chemicals the only debate is whether those defense chemicals are harmful to humans and how well we can detoxify them I would say there's plenty of evidence they're harmful to humans this isothiocyanates the thyroid uh goitrin uh so many other examples of this that I've enumerated multiple times in the past
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.