The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
um and you can just put all of your food into it it's not perfect for micronutrients but if you put a day of eating you'll see calories you'll see macros so fat protein carbohydrates you'll see breakdown of amino acids you'll see micr nutrients and it just gives you a sense if you're massively deficient in something or if you're undereating
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.