The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
humans can make glycine you know it's constitutively required or it's it's I think they say it's conditionally essential but there's plenty of literature to suggest that at least in terms of broadly considered humans most humans don't make enough glycine in their diet every day they run about 10 grams sure just in terms of all these things because we know that we use this amino acid for collagen and glutathione among other things super-important
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
glycine is this key building block and multiple proteins in the human body's connective Judith Iona and collagen they're both three amino acids glutathione is kind of this master antioxidant in the human body at least endogenous antioxidant all connective tissue is made from collagen which is at least a third glycine it's three amino acids