The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
furthermore speth who's another author proposed that humans biosynthesized sufficient dha de novo from precursors and the last argument is compatible with the pre the present existence of several billion people including some hunter-gatherers who have never eaten aquatic sourced food yet they can that they in their offspring can grow and support much larger brains than early humans
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
furthermore speth who's another author proposed that humans biosynthesized sufficient dha de novo from precursors