The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so her metabolism even when we go back to her new maintenance calories after she's added more muscle so physically she's going to look better she still may be lower at the start of that reverse diet which is really interesting to think so there may be some work that's needed to be done reversing just to get her back to maybe that 2,000 calories that she was on she may not be able to go straight back to that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
her metabolism even when we go back to her new maintenance calories after she's added more muscle so physically she's going to look better she still may be lower at the start of that reverse diet which is really interesting to think so there may be some work that's needed to be done reversing just to get her back to maybe that 2,000 calories that she was on she may not be able to go straight back to that it takes weeks
I think that with um proper nutrition intervention and that is like optimizing somebody's metabolism through um the process of reverse dieting so we want to sit right on the edge of like every week we're trying to positively adapt and get their metabolism to to move up and that can be done without any changes in lean body mass