The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
and and and and there is evidence that the nutritional density has a lot to do with the brain's satiation response and so I it's it doesn't get its nutrients so it keeps it's saying I need more food because you haven't fed me yet and and so you know we have a tendency to just dramatically overeat um and consume more calories
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
calorie density which is an important determinant of the satiating and satiety promoting properties of food so in other words how many calories are there per gram or per volume of this food if you have a food that has more volume per calories it fills up your stomach more it stimulates those stretch receptors more that goes up to your brain stem and that's a signal that opposes further food intake