The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if people begin to realize that animal foods are the ideal thing some plant foods can trigger them that's what I'm going for because that I think would result in great health improvements for us as a human being population
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if there's any part of our life that is not optimal people should consider eliminating plant foods and seeing if that part improves because I would say that there are many things about plants that that is highly they're it's there from an evolutionary it's there from an evolutionary perspective to highly discourage animals from eating them
if you're really sick you're not where you want to be or you're not kicking as much but as you want to maybe cutting out those plant foods is gonna really be the tipping point and make a big difference for you